Pages

Sunday, February 11, 2024

CAST AND AIR DATE REVEALED FOR CHANNEL 5 NEW THRILLER MINI SERIES TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE

  TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE  
CHANNEL 5 NEW MINI TV SERIES
New series starts February 14th
First new series coming up from Channel 5 this year is four part thriller TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE which arrives February 14th! Kara Tointon plays young, single mother Rachel who is on the poverty line with young son Liam, but she works all hours of the day as a cleaner to give him the best life she can. One day, her boss at the cleaning firm is approached by a businesswoman who says she’s acting for an extremely wealthy client called Elliot (Allen Leech). Her client has observed Rachel working at a hotel where he’s a regular guest and she asks if Rachel can clean for him exclusively. Better pay, less hours – it sounds too good to be true. Gradually Elliot’s behaviour towards Rachel and Liam becomes increasingly controlling. When suspicions are raised, Rachel starts to dig into his past, uncovering a dark and disturbing story from his childhood that explains his obsession with them. What ensues is a nail-biting thriller that asks the question: how far would you go to repair your past? 

11 comments:

  1. Sounds like a watchable series..I just don't believe a young sexy woman like her would work as a cleaner...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sexy? She looks very plain and common to me, especially without make up, I was wondering what would that hot guy see in that Plain Jane LOL

      Delete
  2. Indeed, if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is. I'd never trust an offer like that. My suspicions would be on high alert.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Most would accept an offer like that from such a hot and rich guy.

      Delete
    2. Allison and her friends are learning quickly that they can't sell feet pics online and make money. These girls thought they'd be able to snap some pics and men would line up to pay them for their tootsies. LMAO! Nope, they want the booties and boobies in those pics along with the feet. Nothing is ever as easy as it seems.

      Delete
    3. Oh, Jesus, I am so disappointed in Allysabeth right now. What is wrong with that child? LOL

      Delete
    4. Just a bunch of young girls looking to make a quick buck. She did sell one for $300 a few years ago. A picture of a black fuzzy sock on her foot. No face or other body pics required. Like, who pays for that? Her friends are all selling feet pics (or trying to lol) these days, so she thought she'd try again. The market has changed since she sold them before. Ain't as easy as it once was. I think she gave up after about a day since she kept getting gross messages from men. Like, you didn't know that was going to happen? Jesus!

      Delete
    5. It is still something sexual because those who buy it probably use it to get horny, I defo do not approve and do not understand today's TikTok, YouTube brats, they will all end up on OnlyFans later on. I'd be ashamed to earn money without using my brain, just looks. But we all know young gens are emptybrained, sadly and vain. And when they act in groups they are even more superficial, methinks. I did not even let my students wear make up in the classroom... Kids have no business posing, playing models or doing anything vain. And TikTok needs to be outlawed.

      Delete
    6. It's really no different than strippers, sex workers and porn stars, lingerie models or even actors who shoot provocative scenes and get paid large sums of money for it. Both men and women are using the sex sells motto to their advantage to make quick money these days. If it's done by adults, I'm not going to bash either the sellers or the buyers because consenting adults have that choice to make without judgement. Absolutely I agree with you, but sadly we live in a world where vanity rules and the more technology that comes our way, the more we will see things like this. I honestly cringe at the word "influencer". No, you're just a vapid person with a cell phone that thinks their opinion matters to the world. I was watching a mother/daughter duo do a skincare routine on Facebook (came up in my for you vids and idk why, but it wasn't something I sought out) and this little 10 year old girl was talking about how great the product was and "OMG the packaging is just sooo amazing." Um, when I was 10 I was playing with Barbie dolls and these 10 year olds are trying to convince their peers that they need $50 face cream because the packaging is "like, so incredible." Da fuq? I'm guilty of scrolling through TikTok and enjoying the animal videos, but if it were to get banned today, I think that would be the biggest blessing this generation could receive. Insta, Facebook, Snapchat... they are all trash. I won't even get on Twitter anymore because every time I open it, I get either uncensored dead children, violent acts against other humans, or raunchy porn on the timeline. Thanks, Elon *eyeroll* I'm just ready to delete all the apps and live clueless.

      Delete
    7. Oy, but it is mucho differente, deary, for stripping and whoring and porning we need some talent which is also needed for actors, just posing or showing feet requires no talent nor effort whatsoever, it is just a way to manipulate with people's horniness to get monies. I don't like it and do not approve of it. As you said most influencers are like that, they earn money using no talent, just showing what they bought or got from the sponsors and nonsense like that.

      Delete
  3. Dahlink, porn does not require a lick of talent. We can all bump uglies just the same. There are many actors who don't have a drop of talent in their whole body, many of whom you and I both have discussed here on this very blog, yet they make millions. Models, it takes zero skill to stand in front of a camera to pose for photos. Those men and women won the genetic lottery, that's it. Sports Illustrated models.. are you trying to tell me those models are about selling bikinis to women in a men's magazine? No, they are selling to up the horniness in men. Men who will in turn go to buy Viagra, which is advertised in said magazine. Why is Viagra celebrated but feet pics to the same effect are bashed? Because a woman made the choice? Why have you not condemned the men who seek out the feet pics? Do you condemn the men who seek out porn too? That's used to ramp up horniness cause porn sure isn't for passing mindless time. With the same lack of not putting both parties on blast but focusing solely on what he woman has done wrong in using her feet to make money, we can assume that it's a woman's fault when she's sexually assaulted because she wore too much makeup and not enough clothing? This is an example of putting the blame back on a woman and condemning her for something a man is seeking out. You don't have to agree with it or even like it, but again, it's a choice made between two consenting adults both male and female. A service is offered and a service is paid for, whether it be feet pics, porn or modeling or bad acting. If it's not hurting anyone, carry on I say.

    ReplyDelete

GIVE SOME LOVE TO YOUR DEZZY :) DON'T FORGET THAT BLOGGER'S NEW COMMENT BOX OFTEN REQUIRES FOR YOU TO DISABLE PROTECTION ON YOUR BROWSER IN ORDER TO COMMENT.